Exhaled Eicosanoids following Bronchial Aspirin Challenge in Asthma Patients with and without Aspirin Hypersensitivity: The Pilot Study.

Background. Special regulatory role of eicosanoids has been postulated in aspirin-induced asthma. Objective. To investigate effects of aspirin on exhaled breath condensate (EBC) levels of eicosanoids in patients with asthma. Methods. We determined EBC eicosanoid concentrations using gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC-MS) and high-performance liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS(2)) or both. Determinations were performed at baseline and following bronchial aspirin challenge, in two well-defined phenotypes of asthma: aspirin-sensitive and aspirin-tolerant patients. Results. Aspirin precipitated bronchial reactions in all aspirin-sensitive, but in none of aspirin-tolerant patients (ATAs). At baseline, eicosanoids profile did not differ between both asthma groups except for lipoxygenation products: 5- and 15-hydroxyeicosatetraenoic acid (5-, 15-HETE) which were higher in aspirin-induced asthma (AIA) than inaspirin-tolerant subjects. Following aspirin challenge the total levels of cysteinyl-leukotrienes (cys-LTs) remained unchanged in both groups. The dose of aspirin had an effect on magnitude of the response of the exhaled cys-LTs and prostanoids levels only in AIA subjects. Conclusion. The high baseline eicosanoid profiling of lipoxygenation products 5- and 15-HETE in EBC makes it possible to detect alterations in aspirin-sensitive asthma. Cysteinyl-leukotrienes, and eoxins levels in EBC after bronchial aspirin administration in stable asthma patients cannot be used as a reliable diagnostic index for aspirin hypersensitivity.

Prostaglandin E2 systemic production in patients with asthma with and without aspirin hypersensitivity.

BACKGROUND: A special regulatory role for prostaglandin E2 has been postulated in aspirin-induced asthma. A study was undertaken to investigate the effects of aspirin on the systemic production of prostaglandin E2 and cysteinyl leucotrienes in patients with asthma. METHODS: The urinary concentrations were determined of two main prostaglandin E2 metabolites (13,14-dihydro-15keto-PGE2 using a commercial enzyme immunoassay and 9,15-dioxo-11alpha-hydroxy-2,3,4,5-tetranor-prostane-1,20-dioic acid by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry) and leucotriene E4 using an immunoassay. Determinations were performed at baseline and following oral aspirin and celecoxib challenges in two well-defined asthma phenotypes: aspirin-sensitive and aspirin-tolerant patients. RESULTS: Aspirin precipitated bronchial reactions in all aspirin-sensitive patients but in none of the aspirin-tolerant patients. Celecoxib 400 mg was well tolerated by all patients except for one with aspirin-induced asthma. At baseline, the mean levels of prostaglandin E2 metabolites did not differ between the groups. Following different aspirin provocation doses, the mean levels of the two main prostaglandin E2 metabolites were decreased in the aspirin-tolerant group but remained unchanged in the aspirin-sensitive group. The dose of aspirin had no effect on the magnitude of the response on the prostaglandin E2 metabolites and its duration. In both groups, urinary prostaglandin E2 metabolites decreased following celecoxib challenge. No correlation was found between prostaglandin E2 metabolites and leucotriene E4. CONCLUSIONS: Aspirin-precipitated asthmatic attacks are not associated with changes in the systemic production of prostaglandin E2. In contrast, the systemic production of prostaglandin E2 becomes depressed by aspirin in non-sensitive patients. This different response might indicate COX-1-dependent prostaglandin E2 control of inflammatory cells in aspirin-induced asthma. Thus, PGE2 is released during the clinical reactions to aspirin through an alternative COX-2 pathway. The clinical implications of this finding are in line with current observations of good tolerance of the selective COX-2 inhibitors in aspirin-sensitive patients.

Protection against exercise-induced bronchoconstriction by montelukast in aspirin-sensitive and aspirin-tolerant patients with asthma.

BACKGROUND: Montelukast, a cysteinyl-leukotriene receptor antagonist, was reported to have a protective effect against exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB). Aspirin-induced asthma (AIA) is characterized by overproduction of cysteinyl-leukotrienes. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to compare the response to exercise and the effect of montelukast on EIB in AIA as compared to aspirin-tolerant asthma (ATA). METHODS: A placebo-controlled, double blind, cross-over randomized study was performed in 19 AIA and 21 ATA patients with stable asthma. A single dose of montelukast (10 mg) or placebo (PL), was given orally one hour prior to exercise challenge. FEV1 was measured before and 5, 10, 15 min after exercise and then at 15-minute intervals for 4 h. Urinary LTE4 excretion and blood eosinophil count were measured at baseline, 2 h and 4 h following exercise challenge. RESULTS: Positive bronchial response to exercise was observed in 47.5% of all patients studied. Exercise led to almost identical maximal fall in FEV1 in AIA and ATA patients (23.5% +/- 6.8% vs. 21.8% +/- 12.0%, respectively; P = 0.7). Montelukast, as compared to PL, significantly attenuated EIB in 63.2% of 19 patients with positive exercise test preceded by PL. The mean of maximum fall in FEV1 from the pre-exercise value was 10.2% +/- 13.8 after montelukast as compared to 22.5% +/- 10.2 after placebo (P < 0.001). No significant differences between protective effect of montelukast was observed in AIA as compared to ATA patients (P = 0.63, anova). Urinary LTE4 excretion showed no change following exercise, irrespective of the result of the test in all subjects. CONCLUSION: Patients with AIA and ATA react similarly to exercise challenge and obtain similar protection against EIB by montelukast.